While there has finally been a ruling on the boundary dispute between the Chagos Islands and the Maldives last Friday, 28th April 2023, it appears that the issue is far from over.
The recent ruling on the maritime boundary dispute between the Maldives and Mauritius has brought about mixed reactions from various quarters. While on paper, the ruling favoured the Maldives, it has not been without criticisms and heavy discussions, mostly directed at the Maldivian government.
The ruling, which allocated 47,323 square kilometres to the Maldives and 45,331 square kilometres to Mauritius, was seen as a victory for the Maldives. However, many have criticized the Maldivian government's handling of the dispute, claiming that it failed to protect the country's interests adequately.
One of the main criticisms levelled against the Maldivian government was that it failed to adequately defend the country's position during the arbitration proceedings. Many have claimed that the Maldives did not present a strong enough case to support its claims, leading to a ruling that was not entirely satisfactory.
There have also been concerns about the potential impact of the ruling on the Maldives' fishing industry. With the allocation of the maritime boundary, there are fears that some of the country's traditional fishing grounds may now fall within Mauritius' territory, leading to a loss of income for Maldivian fishermen. The ruling has also sparked discussions about the wider issue of sovereignty and territorial disputes in the region. Some have suggested that the ruling sets a precedent for future disputes and that countries in the region need to take a more assertive stance in defending their territorial claims.
Despite the criticisms and discussions, the Maldivian government has welcomed the ruling, stating that it is a positive step towards resolving the longstanding dispute with Mauritius. The government has also assured its citizens that the ruling will not have a significant impact on the country's economy or fishing industry. While the ruling may have favoured the Maldives on paper, its impact on the country's fishing industry and sovereignty remains a topic of concern.
In the wake of the maritime boundary dispute ruling between the Maldives and Mauritius, there have been further political developments in the Maldives. The Maldives National Party (MNP) has filed a no-confidence motion against government workers who were involved in the Chagos Island case.
The MNP has stated that it is working with other political parties in the country, apart from the ruling Maldives Democratic Party (MDP), to ensure that the no-confidence motion is successful.
Speaking on this matter during a press conference held by the former Attorney Generals and political parties against the Government in the Chagos case, the member of MNP stated that the ruling is not advantageous to the Maldivian people and the Government should be held responsible for this ruling.